Posts Tagged ‘ Feed-in Tariffs ’
Pages1

Feed Tariff’s – The next step in California’s journey is in the mail …

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

We received a nice surprise in the mail this week. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) has sent a letter to all Net Energy Metering (NEM) customers. This letter provides clarity on the path California is taking with the passage of Assembly Bill 920 – Huffman – Solar and Wind Generation. Before AB 920, residential power production can feed energy into the grid, get credits for that energy, but received nothing if more power went into the grid that was pulled out of the grid.

This model was a counter incentive to more solar installations in the the state. Home owner’s were not motivated to invest in site generated power (solar and wind) nor continue with maximized efficiencies to put more power into the grid. AB 920 changed this model. 2010/2011 are the transition years where the home owner gets paid at the year end “true-up” period (true-up allows for the averaging of the year’s power productions – compensating for day light hours and other seasonal impact).  Now a home owner will get paid for the excess power sent into the grid.  Feed-in tariffs are now real in California.

For those who are interested, I’ve transcribed the letter.

January 29, 2010

Subject: Assembly Bill 920 and Your New PG&E Net Energy Metering (NEM) Options

Dear Laina Greene:

PG&E would like to let you know about a Net Energy Metering (NEM) program enhancement that goes into effect this year. Late in 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger approved a new program feature (Assembly Bill 920 – Huffman – Solar and Wind Generation) that provides a new compensation option to your basic NEM program.

If you provide more energy to PG&E’s electric system (PG&E grid) than you receive on a 12 month basis, you will be identified as a “net generator.” As a result, you will have the ability to receive a once-per-year compensation for the excess electricity you supply to the PG&E grid. Starting in 2011, this compensation will be calculated at the time of your normally scheduled, annual true-up.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) still has to determine the details before the new enhancements to the NEM program are fully implemented. In the meantime, you will automatically be enrolled in the new program and the 12-month period that determines your eligibility for compensation will start on your regular 2010 true-up date. For example:

  1. If you qualify as a net generator at the end of your 12 month true-up period starting in 2010 (and ending in 2011), you will qualify or compensation for your net excess electricity. PG&E will automatically notify you at that tie of your compensation options.
  2. If you do not qualify as a net generator at the end of your 12 month true-up period, you will not be eligible for compensation for that period and there will be no change from the current NEM program. If you should become a net generator in a subsequent 12-month true-up, PG&E will then notify you of your compensation choices.

If you would like to move up the 2010 start date of your 12 month true-up period, you may elect to do so by providing the information requested below and submitting it to PG&E at

NEM Compensation Program

PC Box 770000

MC B12CSan Francisco, CA 94177

If you do not choose to move up your upcoming 2010 true-up date, PG&E will perform a true-up of your account once we receive your request. However, your surplus electricity, if you have any associated with the previous true-up period, will be zeroed out.

In summary, you do not need to take any action to be eligible for the new program, and PG&E will automatically notify you of your compensation options if you qualify as a net generator. You may want to periodically check for updates on the new features at our solar energy website (http://www.pge.com/solar), or feel free to call our Solar Customer Service Center at 1-877-743-4112.

We appreciate your ongoing business and will continue to inform you of any significant updates or changes to the NEM program as they occur.

Sincerely,

Felecia K Lokey

Senior Director

Customer Engagement

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Feed-in Tariff’s Impact on California = Germany Runs Out of Solar Panels Due to Generous Feed-In Tariffs

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

Feed-in Tariffs in California are here! Will 2010 replicate in California the phenomenal expansion of Photovoltaic capacity in California that Germany has experienced in 2009? Susan Kraemer highlights how Germany is reaching the Solar Panel supply capacity limits in Germany Runs Out of Solar Panels Due to Generous Feed-In Tariff.  This is an indication of what could happen in California. On Oct 11, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger, without any fanfare or press release changed California’ GRID.  Two bills were signed:

AB 920 – Solar and Wind Distributed Generation – Removed the consumer cap on Net Metering. Before, if you produced more power than consumed, the power company was not obligated to pay you for the excess power. That cap is removed, allowing for Feed-in Tarrifs to be set by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and compensate consumers.

SB 32 – Renewable Electric Generation Facilities – Mandates the power company buy solar power from small and medium sized installations. This opens park lots, commercial real estate, and other area to get a feed-in tariff set by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC).

This dramatic change in the GRID  was lost in California’s news. Everyone was talking about the Water Bill negotiations and the budget crisis. AB 920 and SB 32 were signed with no notice. The only thing we have are these two statements:

SB 32:

To the Members of the California State Senate:

I am signing Senate Bill 32, which would revise and expand the feed-in tariff (FIT) program
from 1.5 MW to 3 MW for eligible renewable electric generation facilities and authorizes the
Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to adjust the rate to reflect the value of the electricity and
other attributes.

In order to meet our greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and a Renewable Portfolio
Standard of 33% by 2020, we will need to use all of the tools available under our existing
programs to get to that goal. By increasing the size of projects allowed under the FIT program
and increasing the cumulative cap for investor-owned utilities for FIT projects, this bill is a step
in the right direction.

The PUC is also currently exploring an expanded FIT for small to medium scale renewable
generation using a market-based pricing approach. In addition to implementing the provisions of
this bill, I encourage the PUC to continue their work so that we can take advantage of the new
renewable electricity capacity that a robust FIT program can provide.

Sincerely,
Arnold Schwarzenegger

AB 920 was just as bad, with no “extra statement” and a slight mention in the Oct 12th, 2009 press release Gov. Schwarzenegger Signs Legislation to Protect Environment, Create Jobs were we get the following:

The Governor also signed AB 920 by Assembly member Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) that will allow electric utility customers who install solar or wind generators on their property to be paid by their electric utility for all the surplus electricity they produce.

What does this mean? It mean that transformation change comes to California – but with no one noticing. Granted, it will take time to re-educate home owners and businesses to take advantage of California Feed-in Tariffs. It will take time for the PUB to set the rates. It will take time for commercial real estate to realize the “passive cash flow” to be gained through solar installations on their property. It will take time. We’ve see that in Germany. The build up of “market awareness” takes time. As pointed out in  Erik Kirschbaum’s article Germany to post record rise in solar capacity, the ramp up to Germany’s leadership in PV installation (currently a 1/3 of the worlds 15 Mw capacity) took years. This year’s rapid increase is a combination of factors – along with a growth limiter from the financial crisis and scarcity of residential and commercial credit. Imagine what would happen when credit is available? Can this be repeated in California?

Related Articles:

Pages1